tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5767283.post109482831433650164..comments2006-11-15T17:15:59.543-05:00Comments on Had It?: Forged??? Not by MS Word anyway!Unknownnoreply@blogger.comBlogger1125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5767283.post-1094849582451320592004-09-10T16:53:00.000-04:002004-09-10T16:53:00.000-04:00Why would a '7' be designed with a baseline dip? ...Why would a '7' be designed with a baseline dip? Answer: it wouldn't -- these are FAX artifacts.<br /><br />The evidence that these are not documents produced in 72-73 is overwhelming. Sadly, the left blogosphere is getting itself into trouble by arguing to the contrary, which is exactly what Rove et. al. want. The real story is that there is plenty of other evidence that Bush went AWOL twice, and that Bobby Hodges has vouched for the accuracy of the content of these letters, and Ben Barnes has acknowledged that he helped get Bush into the Nat. Guard (and the evidence that Bush didn't get in fairly was already overwhelming).<br /><br />Although the docs were not produced in 72-73, they may well be copies of docs that were, rather than being forgeries. See<br />http://www.bopnews.com/archives/001514.html<br />for an analysis.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com